• Blog
  • CSDDD & CSRD Omnibus Amendments: What Companies Need to Know
December 19, 2025
Maximilian Dippold
Connect on

CSDDD and CSRD Omnibus Amendments: What Companies Need to Know

On December 16, 2025, the European Parliament approved sweeping changes to the CSRD and CSDDD. While fewer companies are now formally in scope, supply chain due diligence and sustainability reporting remain essential. This article explains what the Omnibus changes mean in practice and how businesses can respond strategically.

European Parliament Approves Omnibus Changes to CSDDD and CSRD - An Overview

On December 16, 2025, the European Parliament approved the long-awaited Omnibus package, a set of amendments that reshapes two cornerstone EU sustainability laws: the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The vote marked one of the final political steps in a process the European Commission launched earlier in 2025 to reduce the administrative burden for companies and recalibrate the EU’s sustainability rulebook.

The Omnibus package significantly narrows the scope of both directives. For the CSRD, the amendments raise the size thresholds for companies required to report, meaning that far fewer businesses will need to prepare sustainability reports in line with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). In practice, the rules shift from affecting a broad swath of medium-sized companies to focusing predominantly on large enterprises, easing pressure on thousands of organizations across Europe.

The CSDDD also undergoes major changes. The Omnibus vote results in higher company-size thresholds, a reduced scope, and extended implementation timelines. The EU also dropped earlier plans for harmonized civil liability rules, leaving enforcement more firmly in the hands of national legislators. However, the strategic relevance of supply chain due diligence remains. The new legislative certainty allows companies to transition from a wait-and-see attitude to a phase of active preparation and value-oriented implementation.

With the Parliament’s approval secured, the Omnibus amendments now move to the Council for adoption before becoming enshrined in EU law. Formal approval by EU Member States is expected soon.

European Parliament Approves Omnibus Changes to CSRD and CSDDDDisclaimer: Information as of December 17, 2025. Subject to change based on future legislative decisions.

Key CSRD Omnibus Changes

While the EU policy objective of enhanced transparency remains unchanged, the practical application of the CSRD has been significantly amended.

Reduced Scope

Under the original CSRD, companies were required to report if they met two out of three criteria: more than 250 employees, over €50 million turnover, or €25 million in total assets. This would have brought a very large number of mid-sized companies into scope.

Following the Omnibus changes, the scope has been substantially reduced. Mandatory CSRD reporting will apply only to companies that:

  • have more than 1,000 employees, and
  • generate an annual net turnover of more than €450 million.

As a result, the CSRD becomes a framework clearly focused on large enterprises, significantly lowering the number of affected companies across the EU. This applies to EU companies as well as non-EU companies with substantial activity in the EU. For non-EU groups, a turnover threshold of €450 million generated in the EU is expected to determine applicability, although final details depend on the adopted legal text.

Note that sector-specific reporting will become voluntary.

Listed SMEs Fully Exempted

Another major shift concerns listed SMEs. While they were previously included under a lighter reporting regime, the Omnibus package fully removes listed SMEs from the CSRD’s mandatory scope. This represents a clear political decision to shield smaller capital-market actors from disproportionate reporting efforts.

Reporting Timelines: “Stop-the-Clock” in Practice

The Omnibus also affects the reporting timelines of certain companies, taking into account the “stop-the-clock” decision made earlier this year:

  • Wave 1 companies (already subject to the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD)) continue reporting as planned. However, this only affects those with more than 1,000 employees and an annual net turnover of more than €450 million.
  • Wave 2 companies will start reporting in 2028, covering financial year 2027. This affects non-NFRD companies with more than 1,000 employees and a net annual turnover of more than €450 million.
  • Wave 3 companies will start reporting in 2029, covering financial year 2028. This affects non-EU companies with a net annual turnover of more than €450 million in the EU.

This delay gives companies additional time to prepare internal systems, data processes, and governance structures.

External Assurance and the Role of Subsidiaries

The Parliament also adjusted assurance requirements. The originally planned shift to a reasonable assurance regime has been dropped. Instead:

  • limited assurance remains the standard, and
  • related assurance standards are expected by October 2026.

In addition, groups benefit from greater flexibility when it comes to acquisitions: newly acquired subsidiaries may be excluded from consolidated sustainability reporting for up to 24 months, easing integration challenges.

Clear Limits on Value Chain Data Requests

Finally, the Omnibus introduces explicit safeguards for smaller suppliers. Companies are no longer allowed to request unlimited sustainability data from smaller value chain partners. Firms with fewer than 1,000 employees will not have to provide information to their bigger business partners beyond what is included in the voluntary reporting standards. To facilitate compliance, the Commission will establish a digital portal with access to templates and guidelines on EU and national reporting requirements.

Key CSDDD Omnibus Changes

The EU’s core ambitions of human rights protection and environmental responsibility along global supply chains remain relevant, but lawmakers have decided to simplify due diligence obligations and reduce the administrative burden on affected companies.

Significantly Higher Thresholds

Under the Omnibus package, the CSDDD will apply only to EU companies with more than 5,000 employees and a net worldwide turnover exceeding €1.5 billion.

For non-EU companies, employee numbers are no longer decisive. Instead, the directive applies if they generate more than €1.5 billion net turnover in the EU.

This firmly positions the CSDDD as a framework targeting only the largest multinational enterprises.

Reduced Due Diligence Scope

The Omnibus also limits the operational reach of due diligence obligations. Instead of covering the full value chain by default companies are now required to focus on:

  • their own operations,
  • subsidiaries, and
  • direct business partners.

A deeper assessment of indirect partners is only required where objective and verifiable information indicates a concrete risk. This marks a clear shift away from blanket value chain coverage to a distinct risk-based approach that directs companies’ efforts toward the most critical areas of their value chain.

Climate Transition Plans Removed

Another key change is the removal of the obligation to adopt and implement climate transition plans under the CSDDD. The topic remains relevant under the CSRD, when considered material, rather than under due diligence law – reducing overlap between the two frameworks.

Delayed Timelines and Adjusted Enforcement

Timelines under the CSDDD are pushed back by one year:

  • Transposition into national law is now due by July 26, 2028.
  • First application of obligations will begin on July 26, 2029.

Enforcement mechanisms were also softened. Maximum administrative fines are capped at 3% of net worldwide turnover, and plans for a harmonized EU civil liability regime have been abandoned. Civil liability will instead remain governed by national law.

What do the CSDDD Omnibus Changes Mean in Practice?

The revised directive sharpens legal obligations, but supply chain due diligence continues to shape how companies manage risk, performance, and sustainability. Here's what the changes mean in practical terms.

1. Fewer Companies in Scope – Many Reasons to Act

For many organizations, the most immediate change is that they will no longer fall under the scope of the directive. Nevertheless, this does not imply that due diligence becomes less relevant. Companies that remain in scope must build a targeted risk-based due diligence framework, strengthen impact identification, engage with stakeholders more systematically and understand how their processes must evolve to meet the directive’s expectations.

Supply chain due diligence remains part of a much broader regulatory environment. Today, organizations operate across multiple layers of sustainability compliance – from the CSRD to the EUDR, EU Forced Labor Regulation, sector-specific rules and international standards.

Many of these frameworks directly or indirectly require due diligence processes such as risk identification, impact mitigation, or responsible sourcing. Certifications such as ISO 14001 or 45001 also require structured documentation and monitoring of supplier performance, environmental impacts and risk controls.

At the same time, customer and investor expectations are increasingly filling regulatory gaps and demand credible evidence of robust due diligence measures.

In short: Despite the CSDDD’s narrower scope, its underlying obligations and stakeholder expectations continue to drive broad, evolving approaches to supply chain management.

2. What Are the Next Legislative Steps?

Following the European Parliament’s adoption of its legal position, the legislative process now proceeds through the following steps:

  • Formal Council approval
  • Publication in the Official Journal of the EU and entry into force
  • Transposition into national law by July 26, 2028
  • First application of due diligence obligations on July 26, 2029
  • Potential future scope expansion and liability adjustments via the review clause

Many organizations already have well-established due diligence processes and strategies in place. The next step is to refine and align them with the risk-based logic of the CSDDD, prioritizing high-impact areas and ensuring that preventive and corrective actions are clearly structured.

It is equally important to develop a broader supply chain due diligence strategy that integrates regulatory obligations with strategic objectives such as supply chain resilience, quality improvement, commercial readiness, and sustainability ambitions.

A flexible, technology-supported approach will be increasingly essential. The requirements that companies face – both regulatory and non-regulatory – continue to evolve, and organizations need tools that can adapt accordingly. Companies that invest in stronger due diligence capabilities now will be better positioned – not only for the next regulatory cycle, but also to gain a competitive edge.

3. Leveraging Due Diligence Investments

The revised thresholds raise an important question: What happens to companies that were once in scope but no longer meet the revised thresholds?

Many of these organizations have already built mature due diligence structures – in part due to existing national laws such as the German Supply Chain Act (LkSG), but also because they committed to supply chain due diligence as a long-term strategic priority.

These companies now need to decide whether to pause their efforts or press forward. But in truth, the choice is much simpler – step away from a well-functioning system or leverage it as a strategic asset.

The political debate often overlooks how advanced these processes already are. Years of investment in capacity building, technology, and supplier engagement have created robust risk management and resilient supplier networks. And these investments were never solely about compliance. They were made because due diligence improves performance, stabilizes supply chains, and delivers measurable business value – ultimately strengthening companies' competitive position.

4. Why Due Diligence Continues to Create Value

 Market dynamics, investor expectations and operational realities continue to influence how organizations manage their supply chains – and the benefits of maintaining a robust due diligence system are increasingly obvious.

  • Commercially: Companies with transparent, credible ESG data are better positioned to win tenders and strengthen customer relationships.
  • Financially: Strong risk management and ESG documentation supports better credit ratings and can unlock more favorable financing terms.
  • Operationally: Early risk detection enhances resilience, reduces disruptions, and improves quality.
  • Efficiency-wise: Automation cuts manual workload, accelerates supplier onboarding, and frees up capacity for strategic tasks.

Translating sustainability efforts into measurable KPIs will be the core challenge of value-driven due diligence.

The Big Picture

Taken together, the Parliament’s Omnibus position delivers a clear message:

  • The CSRD becomes a reporting regime for large companies, with delayed timelines and limited assurance.
  • The CSDDD is restricted to the largest players, with narrower due diligence expectations and delayed application.
  • Smaller companies and suppliers are increasingly protected from disproportionate obligations, including requests for information.
  • Core sustainability objectives remain intact, but implementation is simplified and streamlined.

The final CSDDD Omnibus decision doesn’t diminish the importance of supply chain due diligence, it redefines its role. With political uncertainty finally resolved, companies now have the clarity and time they need to refine their due diligence strategies. Those who invest in technology-supported, value-driven due diligence will be better prepared for future regulations – including the EU Forced Labor Regulation and the EU Batteries Regulation – more competitive in the market, and better equipped to manage operational and financial risks.

Ultimately, those companies that treat supply chain due diligence as a strategic asset - rather than a compliance burden - will realize the greatest benefits. By staying aligned with the CSDDD’s underlying purpose - identifying and addressing risks such as poor working conditions, labour exploitation, or environmental harm - they enhance supplier relationships, support responsible business practices, and contribute to more resilient supply chains.

How IntegrityNext Supports Due Diligence and Sustainability Reporting

IntegrityNext offers a comprehensive platform for regulatory and value-driven due diligence – as well as end-to-end sustainability reporting.

Our solutions enable companies to:

  • Align with CSDDD requirements, including new risk areas, supply chain transparency, impact and action management.
  • Build flexible, value-driven due diligence strategies that integrate different regulatory demands with organizational goals.
  • Automate supplier communication, assessment, and monitoring to improve efficiency and transparency.
  • Meet CSRD reporting obligations, including materiality assessment, data collection, documentation, and disclosure.
  • Adapt quickly to future developments, including potential scope extensions and new regulatory requirements.

Due diligence made simple: We guide you through the entire due diligence journey. Our experts help you navigate the regulatory landscape, interpret CSDDD requirements, and align your internal processes. With strong technical and operational support, we work with you to build a flexible due diligence system designed to evolve with your organizational needs.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ): Understanding the Omnibus Changes to the CSRD and CSDDD

1. What did the European Parliament approve on 16 December 2025?

The Parliament approved the Omnibus package — a set of amendments to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) — aimed at simplifying rules and reducing the regulatory burden on companies.

2. How does the Omnibus package affect the CSRD?

The scope of the CSRD has been significantly reduced. Reporting now applies only to companies with more than 1,000 employees and €450 million in annual net turnover, shifting the focus to large enterprises. Listed SMEs are fully exempt.

3. When do the new CSRD reporting requirements take effect?

Reporting timelines have been adjusted as follows:

  • Wave 1 companies (NFRD) with more than 1,000 employees and a net annual turnover of more than €450 million remain on the original schedule.
  • Wave 2 companies begin reporting in 2028 (covering FY 2027).
  • Wave 3 companies begin in 2029 (covering FY 2028).

4. What are the key changes to the CSDDD?

The CSDDD will apply only to:

  • EU companies with over 5,000 employees and €1.5 billion in turnover
  • Non-EU companies generating €1.5 billion in turnover within the EU
  • Due diligence scope is now limited to own operations, subsidiaries, and direct partners — with indirect value chain assessments required only if specific risks are identified.

5. Are companies still required to implement climate transition plans?

No. The CSDDD no longer requires companies to adopt or implement climate transition plans. This topic remains covered under the CSRD, if deemed material.

6. What are the new implementation timelines for the CSDDD?

  • Transposition into national law: by July 26, 2028
  • Application of obligations: begins July 26, 2029

7. What happens to companies no longer in scope of the CSDDD?

Even if no longer legally required, many companies continue investing in due diligence to protect earlier efforts, meet customer and investor expectations, and retain strategic advantages built through compliance readiness.

8. Does the CSDDD still apply to indirect suppliers or the full value chain?

Not by default. Under the Omnibus changes, companies are required to focus on their own operations, subsidiaries, and direct business partners. Indirect value chain assessments are only necessary if there is objective and verifiable information indicating a specific risk — marking a shift toward a more targeted, risk-based approach.

Go back