• Blog
  • Digitalizing EUDR Due Diligence: Turning Compliance into a Process
November 11, 2025
Alexander Hellwig
Connect on

Digitalizing EUDR Due Diligence: Turning Compliance into a Reliable Process

With the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) coming into effect, due diligence is no longer optional — it’s an operational necessity. Ensuring that every product entering or leaving the EU is deforestation-free requires data transparency, system integration, and supplier alignment. Learn how leading companies are digitalizing their due diligence to meet EUDR with confidence.

For procurement and supply chain teams, compliance requires not only understanding the regulation but embedding it into daily operations. That means uniting data, systems, and suppliers under a transparent, verifiable process that can withstand regulatory scrutiny.

This blog explores how organizations can achieve that transformation — bringing structure, consistency, and accountability to EUDR due diligence through digitalization and seamless system integration.

Understanding Who is Affected

EUDR obligations vary depending on a company’s size and role within the supply chain. These factors determine the scope of due diligence required and the depth of documentation and verification necessary for compliance.

  1. Company role
    The recently proposed amendments to the EUDR distinguishes between:

Category

Definition

(Upstream) Operators

A natural or legal person who, in the course of a commercial activity, places relevant products on the EU market or exports them.

Downstream Operators

A natural or legal person who, in the course of a commercial activity, places on the EU market or exports relevant products made using other relevant products, all of which are covered by a due diligence statement or by a simplified declaration.

Micro and Small Primary Operators

A natural person or a micro- or small-sized undertaking established in a low-risk country who, in the course of a commercial activity, places on the market or exports relevant products that they have themselves grown, harvested, obtained from, or raised on relevant plots of land — or, in the case of cattle, on establishments.

Trader

A person in the supply chain, other than the operator or downstream operator, who, in the course of a commercial activity, makes relevant products available on the EU market.

 

  1. Company size
    The EUDR differentiates between enterprises according to the EU definition of micro, small, medium, and large companies:
  • Large enterprises (Non-SME*) – Companies meeting at least two of the following three criteria:
    • More than 250 employees
    • Annual net turnover exceeding €50 million
    • Annual balance sheet total exceeding €25 million
  • Micro, small, and medium enterprises (SME*) – Companies meeting at least two of the following three criteria:
    • 250 employees or fewer
    • Annual net turnover of €50 million or less
    • Annual balance sheet total of €25 million or less
  • Micro and small enterprises* – Companies meeting at least two of the following three criteria:
    • 50 employees or fewer
    • Annual net turnover of €15 million or less
    • Annual balance sheet total of €7.5 million or less

*Art. 3 of Directive 2013/34/EU and the national implementation laws define the thresholds, according to which companies are considered as micro, small, medium (all SME) or large undertakings.

Combined, these criteria define the level of due diligence required by each company under the EUDR.

Level of Due Diligence Obligations for EUDR

Note: Information as of October 21, 2025. Subject to change depending on EU legislative decisions.

How Full Due Diligence Works in Practice

A practical example helps illustrate the scope. A German tire manufacturer sourcing natural rubber from Thailand and producing in China is considered an operator under the EUDR. Before placing products on the EU market, the company must:

  • Identify in-scope products.
  • Gather plot-level geolocation data from the rubber harvest sites in Thailand.
  • Demonstrate legal compliance with Thai land and forestry regulations.
  • Conduct risk assessments and apply mitigation measures such as audits if deforestation risks are identified.
  • Generate and submit a due diligence statement through the EU TRACES system.

This workflow highlights that compliance goes far beyond documentation. It requires the operational integration of supplier data, risk analysis, and regulatory reporting across business systems.

Building the Due Diligence Process

Across all levels of obligation, four core steps define an effective due diligence process:

  1. Preparing and collecting data – identifying in-scope products, engaging suppliers, and gathering product, transactional, and supplier information.
  2. Analyzing and verifying risk – assessing geolocation and origin data to detect potential deforestation or non-compliance.
  3. Mitigating and communicating risks – defining corrective measures, requesting further documentation, or commissioning audits where needed.
  4. Reporting and documentation – submitting due diligence statements electronically through the EU information system and maintaining records for audits and annual reports.

Managing these steps manually across thousands of products and suppliers quickly becomes unfeasible — making structured digital processes essential.

The Role of Integration and Data Management

EUDR compliance affects transactional processes directly — every inbound and outbound product movement must be supported by a valid DDS. For most organizations, that means integrating EUDR data flows with existing ERP and procurement systems.

A typical digital workflow includes:

  1. Order data transferred from the ERP to the compliance platform via API.
  2. Automatic supplier questionnaires and risk analyses triggered by the system.
  3. DDS creation and submission through the EU TRACES interface.
  4. Verification and reference numbers sent back to the ERP, allowing purchasing or logistics teams to proceed without switching systems.

This creates a closed data loop where compliance checks happen automatically as part of normal business operations.

Standard Connectors vs. Custom Integrations

Organizations have two main approaches:

  • Standard connectors such as those available in IntegrityNext for SAP S/4HANA and Celonis, which provide preconfigured integration with minimal setup.
  • Custom API integrations, offering more flexibility for companies with complex or multi-ERP environments.

In both cases, success depends on harmonized master data, clear process ownership, and continuous data validation. Explore how the SAP and Celonis integrations work in real-world EUDR implementations in our detailed blog [here].

Preparing for Implementation

Several foundational steps support a successful rollout of EUDR compliance processes:

  • Clarify your regulatory role: Operator, trader, or both.
  • Map your IT landscape: Identify all systems that handle purchasing, product, or supplier data.
  • Check data completeness: Ensure key attributes such as supplier geolocation, production periods, and legality documents are available.
  • Define governance: Decide where DDS validation occurs, who owns risk review, and how non-compliance is escalated.
  • Select integration approach: Choose between a standard connector or a custom API setup, considering available resources and timelines.
  • Plan supplier engagement: Provide clear instructions, language support, and validation mechanisms for accurate data collection.

These elements help organizations move from regulatory awareness to operational readiness.

How does IntegrityNext Enable EUDR compliance?

While the EUDR sets out what companies must achieve, technology defines how efficiently it can be done.

The IntegrityNext EUDR solution offers an end-to-end digital workflow for EUDR due diligence — from supplier data collection and automated risk analysis to DDS submission and ERP integration.

Key features include:

  • A supplier workspace available in multiple languages, supporting structured data input and validation.
  • Automated risk assessment using satellite-based deforestation analysis, EU country benchmarking, and supplier readiness scoring.
  • Built-in action management for mitigation and follow-up.
  • Direct connection to the EU TRACES system for real-time DDS creation and submission.
  • Preconfigured connectors for SAP S/4HANA and Celonis, along with a flexible REST API for other environments.

Together, these capabilities transform EUDR due diligence from a manual compliance task into a transparent, traceable, and scalable process embedded in daily operations

Insights and Takeaways

  • Multi-ERP connectivity is possible through APIs; however, companies must consider how separate systems communicate and how data consistency is maintained.
  • Geolocation verification can be supported through satellite-based analysis to identify deforestation or forest degradation. If suppliers cannot provide required data, the due diligence process cannot proceed until information is complete.
  • Integration choices often depend on timeline and complexity — standard connectors offer speed, while custom APIs enable deeper alignment with internal workflows.

FAQ: Digitalizing EUDR Due Diligence

1. How can companies manage EUDR compliance if they use multiple ERP systems?

Many organizations, particularly mid-cap and multinational groups, operate several ERP systems following acquisitions or regional setups.
The IntegrityNext team confirmed that multiple systems can be connected through the RESTful API, allowing data to flow from different sources into one compliance environment.
The main consideration is how those ERP systems communicate with one another — data consistency and master-data harmonization remain essential to ensure traceability and avoid duplicate records.

2. How is geolocation data verified, and what happens if suppliers cannot provide it?

Geolocation verification under EUDR is critical, as companies must prove the exact origin of commodities down to the plot of land.
IntegrityNext’s platform supports this through satellite-based, multispectral analysis, which detects deforestation and forest degradation after the regulation’s cut-off date.
If suppliers fail to provide the required geolocation data, the due diligence process cannot continue until the missing information is obtained.
To support this, the system allows suppliers to forward data requests to their own sub-suppliers, ensuring the chain of responsibility reaches the actual source of raw materials.

3. What if a company needs to move quickly before the compliance deadline — should it use a standard connector or a custom API?

Both options are viable, but each offers different advantages.

  • Standard connectors (such as those for SAP S/4HANA or Celonis) enable a fast, low-effort setup, ideal for organizations that need to operationalize compliance quickly.
  • Custom REST API integrations allow for tailored configurations that align with specific internal workflows, but typically require more time and IT resources.

    The right choice depends on the company’s system landscape, project timeline, and the level of customization required.

4. How is supplier engagement supported during the due diligence process?

Suppliers often face challenges collecting or formatting the necessary data.
To simplify engagement, IntegrityNext provides a dedicated supplier workspace, available in multiple languages and free of charge.
This workspace validates entries (such as coordinates or production periods), highlights missing fields, and offers a built-in Knowledge Hub with tutorials and best practices.
It ensures data completeness and helps suppliers understand the EUDR requirements without needing additional tools.

5. How are due diligence statements submitted and tracked within the EU system?

Once supplier data is validated and risk assessments are complete, the due diligence statement (DDS) is generated automatically and submitted directly to the EU TRACES portal.
This submission happens in real time, and the resulting reference and verification numbers are returned to the company’s compliance dashboard — or directly into its ERP system through integration.
This closed-loop workflow provides immediate visibility and ensures that no in-scope product enters or leaves the warehouse without an approved DDS.

6. What happens when suppliers operate in countries not yet benchmarked by the EU?

In cases where the EU has not yet classified a country as low, standard, or high risk, companies must apply a full due diligence process until an official risk rating is available.
That includes collecting complete geolocation and legality data, conducting a risk assessment, and retaining all documentation to demonstrate compliance readiness.

7. Can companies pause transactions if data or verification is missing?

Yes. Under EUDR, incomplete data effectively halts compliance.
If geolocation or legality evidence is missing, the due diligence statement cannot be generated or submitted — and the corresponding goods cannot be placed on or imported into the EU market.
This safeguard ensures that every transaction aligns with the regulation’s intent of deforestation-free trade.

Go back